TAXPAYER TEA PARTY FIGHTS OBAMA BUDGET.

The Socialist Pres. Obama budget would raise federal income taxes on singles earning $200,000 or more annually and on couples earning $250,000 or more annually. However, to pay for all his generous spending on pork barrel projects like $238,000 for Polynesian voyaging, Obama probably will have to raise taxes on everyone earning over $75,000. Forcing utility companies to reduce carbon emissions will raise our consumer energy costs for heating, cooling, etc. Taxes on the gas and oil industry will soar, these costs passed along to consumers. Gas pump prices will spiral. Small businesses will hurt badly, laying off employees instead of expanding, not able to afford to make capital investments. Capital gains tax rates for many will rise from 15% to 20%. Wealthier Americans who invest their capital will see their top income tax rate rise from 35% to 40%, dampening their investment enthusiasm. Retirees now see their investment income disappearing, but Obama wants to tax their investments more. The only Americans to benefit much from the Obama Budget are those who pay no taxes and do not want to work. DON’T BE SHEEPLE; BE ANGRY TAXPAYER PEOPLE! Come and bring friends to our Taxpayer Tea Party to fight the Obama Budget, 6 PM, Wed. March 18, at Millard Library, 132nd & Westwood Ln., Omaha. The Counter-Revolution starts now!

THE WAY THINGS STAY THE SAME.

The beginning of term limits for state senators in our Unicameral Legislature offered many conservatives a sense of euphoria. Many believed that term limits would uproot the entrenched liberal Democrats and Republicans who dominated the various committees and substitute for them an inflow of fiscal conservatives. The election of 2006 disappointed us, because so many new liberals replaced the old ones. It was tough to find good, fiscal conservatives to run for open seats. As usual, the state Republican Party concentrated on running their “machine” candidates and shunned more conservative ones. The fiscal climate in the Unicameral did not improve in 2007 and 2008. Once again, in November of 2008, we campaigned for some good conservative legislative candidates, fighting off not only Socialist Democrat rival candidates but the usual RINOS (Republicans in Name Only) hawked by the GOP Party apparatus. Sad to say, the harvest of incoming state senators provided few Low Taxers/Spenders. Recently, we asked all newly-elected state senators to sign a “Taxpayer Protection Pledge,” promising their respective constituents that they would not raise state taxes barring a declared statewide emergency caused by a natural disaster or other declared calamitous state or national emergency. Not one of these new senators signed it! Garbage out, garbage in! Many state senators from other states have signed an identical pledge. To further insult taxpayers, not one new state senator would agree to introduce a bill to reform structurally the entire property valuation system, to relieve overburdened urban and rural property owners.

Businesses are locating their operations in states with more competitive corporate tax and property tax structures. Their middle management people do not want to live here. Young professionals are leaving the state for states with lower taxes and better salaries. Moving in to take their places are illegal aliens who work for low wages and suck off our generous welfare system, not paying their own way. Nebraska has the highest taxes in every category except one corporate tax category, compared to all adjacent states. Our population ages. Our rural areas become increasingly depopulated. Soon we will become a pariah state for the productive….another People’s Republic of Minnesota. Unless, of course, taxpaying citizens rise off their rears and find solid, conservative candidates to run for state and local offices, then volunteer for and bankroll them.

TAXPAYER CHAMPION WINS ELECTION

Yes, it can be done. So often, I hear from dejected whiners that nobody can do anything to change school board attitudes to include listening to input from beleaguered taxpayers. One of the ways to overcome this obstacle is to run for a school board seat yourself. That is precisely what Jim Enright did, when he ran a 2nd time for a seat on the Omaha Public School Board and won. In District 6, he knocked out a 30+ year incumbent who not only rubber stamped whatever the administration wanted done but also had a bad habit of telling taxpayer watchdogs who spoke at public school board hearings to “Shutup.” Now, taxpayers summarily ignored by OP$ school board members will have a champion on the board, not only to listen to taxpayer suggestions but also to champion our cause with his fellow board members. Jim is a solid fiscal conservative. He overcame huge odds to win his seat, and there certainly will be some resentment from other board members who normally enjoy a clubby fiscal liberal atmosphere at meetings. So, I urge taxpayers to begin attending OP$ board meetings on the first and third Mondays of each month at the Taj Mahal, I mean, TAC Bldg., at 32nd & Cuming Street, at 7:30 PM. Jim Enright will support us taxpayers, so we must support him and his initiatives at board meetings!

HELP LOWER OUR PROPERTY TAXES

Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom will hold another in its series of Property Tax Town Hall meetings on Wed. Aug. 20, 6:30 PM, at Millard Library at 132nd & Westwood Lane, Omaha. A Power Point presentation will show people how to contact their state senators and lobby them to reform the property valuation and tax systems in Nebraska to give tax relief to its citizens. Please come and bring friends & neighbors, because the only way to lower our property taxes is to convince our state senators to reform the property valuation and tax laws. At this meeting, you can get packets that will show you how to contact and lobby your state senator. Only if property taxpayers diligently lobby before the 2009 Unicameral session starts will we see property tax relief next year. You can meet 2-3 conservative state senators and legislative candidates at this meeting, so please come!

Nebraska Vehicle Owners Gouged by the Taxers.

Many Nebraskans realize that our state motor vehicle taxes and fees are higher than those in adjacent states. Therefore, thousands of taxpayers save tax money by registering their vehicles in these border states. In reaction, the state revenue department in cooperation with the NE State Patrol is investigating these tax evaders and mailed letters to over 10,000, advising them to register their vehicles and pay owed vehicle taxes in Nebraska. Because of the differing databases in adjacent states, some people who now register their vehicles lawfully in Nebraska received these threatening letters and must contact the State Patrol to clear their names. This process resembles the failure of the Prohibition laws, which similarly hounded otherwise lawful citizens. Instead, state senators should reform our vehicle tax system, lowering taxes and fees to make it less enticing to title and register vehicles in adjoining states. Then, our government coffers could recoup millions in yearly sales taxes, vehicle taxes, and fees.

Nebraskans in 2006 paid a 5.5% sales tax on vehicles, compared to 5% in Iowa, 4.9% in Kansas, 4.225% in Missouri, 3% in Wyoming and South Dakota, and 2.9% in Colorado.[1] In 2006, NE vehicle annual registration fees stood at $415.50, compared to $300.38 in Wyoming, $269.50 in Colorado, $227.59 in Kansas, $204 in Iowa, $62 in South Dakota, and $54.75 in Missouri. Nebraska stood second highest nationally in total registration costs. Total registration and state and local fuel tax costs placed Nebraska 3rd in the nation.[2] Our vehicle tax has a progressive rate schedule, so price inflation has a heavier effect on tax receipts because of bracket creep. As of 2006, the state sales tax on vehicles has increased faster than our state economy and faster than other services and products covered by the sales tax. From 1998 to 2006, vehicle taxes and fees together have increased faster than inflation and our state economy. This tax burden only offers incentives for Nebraskans to register and title their vehicles in adjacent states.

THE SOLUTION. To reform our state vehicle tax system and make it more equitable to taxpayers, we must lobby our state senators to pass legislation to allow counties to levy local registration taxes. Year #1 of vehicle ownership would accrue a tax of 1.5% of manufacturer suggested retail price, 1.2% in year #2, .9% in year #3, .6% in year #4, and .3% in year #5 and thereafter, the minimum tax set at $5.
[1] A Comparison of Selected Tax Rates in the District of Columbia with those in the 50 States, Table 25.
[2] Idaho Transportation Dept., Economics & Research Section, pp.4-6.

See our NTF issue papers on costs of registering vehicles in Nebraska and our outrageous state gas tax. Email us through our website at www.netaxpayers.org.

NEW BASEBALL STADIUM WILL STRIKE OUT TAXPAYERS

Omaha taxpayers already bent over from the heavy yoke of property taxation will face an additional property tax hike burden, if Mayor Fahey convinces the City Council to vote YES on funding and other mechanisms to begin construction of an unneeded new baseball stadium downtown. Though the Mayor and his Big Business supporters try to scare Omahans that the NCAA will move the College World Series to another locality, if we do not support the Mayor's initiative, the NCAA publicly has stated that it will readily accept a renovation of Rosenblatt Stadium, if the city government offers such alternative. Nevertheless, Mayor Fahey insists that the majority of Omahans genuinely opposing his plan are a mere noisy minority rabble. Read the bullet points below for information you need to lobby your councilman to vote NO on stadium funding:

· The Mayor carefully appointed a study committee of several community leaders, most of whom are his acquaintances, to take a “fresh and unbiased” view of the situation, but he included no taxpayer watchdogs!

· Consultants to the committee, including HDR, an architectural engineering firm, and HOK, a sports architecture firm, could win huge tax-funded contracts to help construct a new stadium.

· The Mayor refuses to allow a citizen vote, believing it “divisive” to the community. Actually, he fears a huge majority vote to retain Rosenblatt Stadium and distrusts the public. A June, 2007 WH poll found that 81% of respondents wanted the College World Series to remain at Rosenblatt.

· The Mayor pledged that he would not propose a new stadium without a signed 20-year contract from the NCAA to keep the CWS in Omaha, but such contract does not exist.

· The Fahey plan would raise our hotel/motel and car rental taxes highest among the 50 largest convention cities, which then will attract tourists and conventions that would have come to Omaha, depriving Omaha merchants of many consumer dollars spent.

· Anticipated stadium project revenues would pay for revenue bonds issued. If insufficient revenue appears, property taxpayers will have to pay the tab! Omahans would pay increased taxes to build and operate a new facility and additional taxes to demolish Rosenblatt Stadium.

· The Mayor declares that he would use property taxes only as a last resort to fund his stadium. We heard similar pledges from former Mayor Hal Daub, who promised no hike in property taxes to pay costs, but homeowners became yoked with a heavy property tax liability for his convention center/arena.

· To replace $2.4 million in Douglas County keno revenues snatched by our Mayor, the county would raise our property taxes. All Omaha property taxpayers reside in Douglas County and would pay higher taxes.

· A possible parking garage next to a downtown stadium and parking at other sites were not factored into the cost equation.

· The market analysis and resulting financial analysis done by Barrett Sports Group (BSG) was limited in scope, because the study did not conduct general public or corporate surveys or use focus groups. BSG admitted difficulty in identifying comparable markets because of the unique nature of the CWS.

· BSG made significant assumptions related to downtown ballpark operating revenues and expenses. Its study implies the possible need for additional funding sources, such as sales or property taxes.

· BSG admitted basing its work in part on information provided by unrelated sources that it could not assure us as accurate. Because of rapid changes in external factors, actual financial results might vary significantly from estimates presented in its report.

· Case studies prove that such new sports facility has a very small, sometimes a negative effect, on overall economic activity and employment. No recent similar facility earns a reasonable return on investment. No such facility has become self-financing regarding impact on net tax revenues. Stadium vicinity spending by consumers only displaces spending that would have happened elsewhere.

· The Mayor cannot guarantee that revenue gained from naming rights, advertising, seat taxes, and leases would pay off 20-yr. general revenue bonds used for stadium construction.

It is imperative that you call, email, or write a letter to your Omaha city councilman today, because special interests already are applying hard pressure to them!
OMAHA CITY COUNCIL EMAIL ADDRESSES
District 1: Jim Suttle 444-5527 jsuttle@ci.omaha.ne.us
District 2: Frank Brown 444-5524 fbrown@ci.omaha.ne.us
District 3: James Vokal 444-5525 jvokal@ci.omaha.ne.us
District 4: Garry Gernandt 444-5522 ggernandt@ci.omaha.ne.us
District 5: Dan Welch 444-5528 dwelch@ci.omaha.ne.us
District 6: Franklin Thompson 444-5523 fthompson@ci.omaha.ne.us
District 7: Chuck Sigerson 444-5526 csigerson@ci.omaha.ne.us
Address mail to: Councilman __________________________
Rm. LC-l
Omaha Civic Center
1819 Farnam Street
Omaha, NE. 68l83-0100

We must reach more citizens! Help us distribute fliers in your neighborhood. Email netaxpayers@cox.net to assist in this effort!

Protect Our Petition Rights in Nebraska

Everyone who values his or her petition rights in our state immediately should contact their state senator to vote NO on LB 39. In recent years, it has become difficult, almost impossible, to wage a successful initiative petition campaign because of additional requirements placed on petition groups by the Legislature. We must contend with a nebulous single subject petition requirement and a doubling of the number of petition signatures. A proposed constitutional amendment cannot go to voters by initiative petition more often than once in 3 years.
Paying petitioners by the signature offers incentive for them to collect a maximum number of signatures, as a commission would offer incentives for employees in a private business. Those who complain about the supposed aggressiveness of petition circulators ignore use of physical obstructive tactics by petition opponents towards circulators exercising their constitutional privilege. Under LB 39, some but not all circulators would have their names, addresses, and phone numbers included in campaign reports. This information becoming public knowledge would subject these circulators to harassment. In 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Nebraska cannot force petition campaigns to file monthly reports identifying paid circulators and expenses paid to circulators, acknowledging the vulnerability of circulators to harassment. Passage of LB 39 certainly would subject the legislation to a court challenge. LB 39 would require circulators to be only NE residents of voting age. We believe that learning about the petition process is a valuable educational experience for our youth. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1996 ruled invalid the NE requirement for all petition circulators to be registered voters.
Nebraska has no 2nd House. The original sponsors meant the initiative petition process to give Nebraska citizens a powerful tool to balance the Unicameral, and we are losing this right. Much of the necessity for requesting assistance from out of state entities stems from the current eroding of our petition rights that makes it much more difficult to launch petitions within the State. Our group has attempted in recent years to place several petitions on the ballot, and we have found it increasingly more difficult to do so because of impediments placed in our way. We regard this latest effort by State Sen. Schimek as sheer revenge against those who promoted the Stop Overspending campaign in 2006.
If you need help locating your state senator, email netaxpayers@cox.net, and we can help you.

STATE SENATORS MUST ACT ON ILLEGAL ALIENS

Illegal aliens are inundating our state, as nearby state legislatures in Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma pass laws to restrict the employment and residency of illegals. Word gets around fast. Nebraska is a welcoming state for illegal aliens. Free K-12 education for the kids. Resident college tuition for young adults. Lots of flophouses to live in. Plenty of jobs at low pay, to undercut businesses and deprive lawful Nebraska citizens of employment. El Welfare galore: free goodies for the anchor babies, and food stamps too! Nebraska is fast becoming a safe and cozy haven for a flood of illegal aliens pouring in from nearby states. A friend of mine in Tulsa, OK., reported to me that hundreds of illegals were leaving Tulsa like rats leaving the proverbial sinking ship. Nebraska taxpayers are paying an increasing load for these unlawful invaders. Yet, we have not found one state senator to introduce a comprehensive bill in the 2008 legislature to deprive illegal aliens of all the benefits they now receive. Shame on our state senators! Who do they represent? Taxpaying citizens or those who prefer to send their money back to their home countries, depriving our consumer economy of these dollars? Contact your state senator today to introduce a bill! Email netaxpayers@cox.net for senator contact information and prospective legislation.

NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS VOTING RECORD

The NTF Congress Watch team has completed our 2006 voting records for our Capitol Hill delegation, and there are no surprises. Congressman Lee Terry from the 2nd District scored 88%, a “B+,” but he would have won an “A” rating had he voted more with conservatives on illegal alien issues. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry held down the fort again with his 83% “B” rating. Cong. Tom Osborne, who continually hawked his supposedly conservative credentials during his 2006 run for governor, scored a paltry 74%, a “C” grade.
On the other end of the Capitol, Sen. Carlos Hagel, ever the champion of illegal aliens, scored a disappointing 79%, only 2 points above Sen. Ben Nelson, who, despite his constant yammering that he is a good fiscal conservative, rated only 77%. Nebraska taxpayers are stuck with Ben-occhio for another 6 years, because they shunned a real fiscal conservative challenger, Pete Ricketts. Nebraskans angry with Sen. Hagel for his stance on illegal immigration, his opposition to Bush’s War, his obvious presidential aspirations, or his tendency to chase the Liberal Media for photo-ops and sound byte commentary*, may wish to join the NTF “Show Hagel the Gate in 2008” project. Email us as shown below.
Those who wish to have a copy of the above voting records can email ntf2@netaxpayers.org.
* Current joke on Capitol Hill: What is the fastest way to get run over in Washington, D.C.? Answer: Get between Chuck Hagel and a TV camera!

LIBERAL STATE SENATORS TRAMPLE PETITION RIGHTS

In 1898, Nebraska became the first state to allow statewide initiative and referendum petitions. Nebraskans subsequently have used the petition process as a useful political means to gain reforms when the legislature has refused to consider them and to repeal unpopular legislation.
Now, two bills and one resolution introduced into our 2007 legislature are poised to trample our petition rights. LB 39 would prevent petition campaigns from paying petition circulators per signature collected and require them to be Nebraska registered voters. Such law would make it more difficult to recruit circulators and cost campaigns additional regulatory expense and paperwork. LB 40 would force petition circulators to wear numbered badges, though a Colorado court invalidated such a law because of privacy and harassment concerns. Failure to wear a badge would constitute a misdemeanor. Wearing such badges would cost campaigns an added expense and expose circulators to increased harassment. During the Stop Overspending campaign, which our taxpayer group supported, goons harassed and intimidated circulators to stop them from collecting signatures and intimidated those wanting to sign. LR 8CA would require 15%, instead of 10%, of state registered voters to sign initiative petitions for proposed constitutional amendments, making it almost impossible to place grass-roots issues on the ballot. These proposals constitute mere revenge by those who fear fiscal issues like Stop Overspending placed on the ballot by petition and want to guarantee their future failure. Instead of punishing out of state entities that assist Nebraska petition campaigns, critics will only punish Nebraskans by gutting another freedom.
The single subject clause already inhibits placing an initiative on the ballot, because the enacting amendment never defined single subject, so courts can conjure whatever definition they wish. A main reason why citizens place more than 1 subject in a petition is because the topics are related and because it is so difficult and expensive to obtain the 110,000+ verifiable signatures to place an issue on the ballot. In 1994, a Nebraska Supreme Court ruling almost doubled the number of signatures required for fulfilling initiative petition requirements. Finding it more difficult to muster sufficient volunteers to gain the newly-required number, plus other restrictions, petition campaigns increasingly resorted to hiring paid circulators and out of state companies to assist. Then came a requirement that a proposed constitutional amendment could not go before voters by initiative petition more often than once in 3 years. Accumulating hurdles have made it impossible in many instances to rely on a pool of volunteer circulators, much needed in this labor-intensive activity. So difficult is waging a successful venture that obstacles dissuade some from donating or circulating. Campaigns must raise huge war chests to pay circulators or forego petitioning. Ironic that petition critics condemn paid circulators and out of state logistical assistance, both resulting from their previous victories in curtailing petition rights. As restrictions have increased, more petitions have failed ballot access, e.g., two taxpayer initiative petitions in 1996 and 4 taxpayer petitions in 2004. Criticism of a surfeit of petitions is tantamount to declaring that there exists too much involvement by citizens in the political process. I believe that state senators by increments have eroded our petition rights to suffocate the petition process that checks their power. Eradicating this freedom will only encourage them to snuff another.
We must restore our petition rights to the setting envisioned decades ago by progressives, who granted us these rights to redress grievances on taxation and other issues, to act as the virtual second house of our legislature as promulgated by Unicameral advocate Sen. George Norris, as a safety valve for citizen discontent.
If unable to petition for redress of grievances, etc. via petition, we will have lost a lawful means of political expression. Restoring the process to make it easier for Nebraska citizens to circulate petitions as volunteers, instead of extinguishing the petition process, would offer them incentive to become politically involved and keep elected officeholders accountable to the electorate.
Make an effort today to lobby your state senator to vote NO on the above 3 travesties. Freedom does not come free!